Tuesday, October 04, 2005

Easy Over There - In a Chair

It's easy to sit behind the keyboard, stroking keys about the Iraq prison abuse or the criminality of the "current administration." Piece of cake to turn out phrases on the most recent headline, hero, or scandal one feels hot for. And it seems real easy for some to call our troops knuckle-draggers feasting on an orgy of killing when one doesn't have a son or loved one sitting and shitting in the sand over there. Easier to chastise others for "sending" their sons to die when one doesn't have a son or loved one to send. Easy to condemn the troops if you don't have to wonder if your rants could get a son fragged over there. There's a lot of crazy in the free world you know.

I wish these wise ones would quit wasting pixels and tell me how a 35 y/o man with 16 years invested, a wife and daughter, with the responsibilities that most Americans have, can throw his hands up and refuse to fight in wars launched by his government. Court martial is not an option for most soldiers. Unfortunately, the jarhead doesn't see those 59 million 2004 Kerry voters in the street to support him if he did lay down his arms.

Where are those 72 percent who when questioned said the conflict has made them feel worse about the use of military force "to bring about democracy"? Are those the same folks who think "democracy" equals "freedom" and together they mean you can vote and own things and go wherever you want? That's the Heartland definition even though most here in the poverty belt own very little, usually don't vote, and their idea of travel is crossing the state line to booze it up with cousins.

Easy to link the ugly news, and it's often ugly, and make snide comments, or snipe at those who disagree; I do it myself at times. The same cowards who urge others to protest or sign online petitions cringe or slink away from calling for revolution; might get their own bourgeois butts in boiling water with the government thugs they claim are corrupt and perverse. Real easy to call for carrying signs or signing petitions; as if that will change anything other than the flunky faces running the system. Easy to sell some stickers, shirts, and buttons; politically it doesn't make any monumental change or significant gains, but it can be a good income. And we're guaranteed to get a few more monuments eventually.

Some keyboard tappers think we can have a "velvet" revolution, in reference to the "bloodless" overthrow of communism in Czechoslovakia. Such keyboard pacifists should know it's not going to happen that way in the USA. Forget that the Czechs split into 2 countries afterwards, Czech Republic and Slovakia, or that the "velvet" was nothing more than switching from a state owned economy to privatization and foreign investment economy i.e. "free market capitalism." Nevermind that whatever "ism" it's called it still operates pretty much the same way, i.e. for the benefit of the few at the expense of many.

Easy to tell others to stand-up while your butt remains comfortably seated. Sitting safely behind the flat screen it's easy to claim the military has betrayed us, but not advocate overthrowing the government of course. Look folks, the military is doing as it has always done, read Major General Smedley Butler's lips : "... muscle men for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers … racketeers, gangsters for capitalism." That is what troops do. They rape other countries for your benefit. Yes, they defend your freedom; your liberty to live as comfortably as you do with the toys you can afford.

The elite seem reassured that folks will stay behind their desk, with a plate of sandwiches and a cola, bleating about bloodless revolutions and how things will be better if we just vote in the right guy the next time. Yep, keep voting. It really does encourage the bankers and gangsters.

14 comments:

Anonymous said...

An article worth its weight in gold if for no other reason than its tribute to common sense as an inalienable aspect of wisdom.

Anonymous said...

"I wish these wise ones would quit wasting pixels and tell me how a 35 y/o man with 16 years invested, a wife and daughter, with the responsibilities that most Americans have, can throw his hands up and refuse to fight in wars launched by his government."

I expect Gestapo Moms said the same. And they had that clinching bullet-in-the-head argument too. Yes its easy to call for illegal immoral orders to be disobeyed from behind a civilian keyboard. Its a benefit
gained from not signing on as a government killbot.

Kate-A said...

Anon - Thank you.

Hi Ian,
Likewise I'm sure many good Germans used "not signing on" as their alibi.

I don't watch Adult Swim or cartoons for big people so I had to check wikipedia for the term "killbot." Although vaguely familiar with it I wasn't sure who/what it referred to, but the "kill-bot" is somewhat self-explanatory.

Anonymous said...

The question remains: how immoral a war, how grotesque conduct, do your Force Protecting Fourth Reich Filth have to be ordered into before they rediscover some form of "honour" and refuse?

Kate-A said...

Ian,

It is one thing to refuse to carry out a direct immoral order by a superior, which I know soldiers who have personally done such, and something else to refuse to take up arms at all after having sworn to do so. Grotesque conduct is not a trait exclusive to those in uniform, as exemplified by corporate heads, politicians, clergy, and man on the street.

I believe it's more than simply expecting our military men and women to say no to war – afterall, George Bush himself once refused to fight in an immoral war called Vietnam (although out of cowardice rather than conscience).

My questions - how immoral must the 4th Rich Filth become before we (all people) destroy them instead of one another? How grotesque before we protect one another instead of the 4th Reich?

Anonymous said...

Your president swore an oath too. "I swore to obey" "Its my duty" These are cowards' words. Yes, if you pay your taxes you are supporting US terrorism, but going out with a gun and shooting somebody, or loading the bombs into the airplanes, is a more direct involvement
and I see no reason whatsoever to "support" anyone who does it.

Kate-A said...

I believe it cowardly to pay taxes, patronize known corporate abusers, drive everywhere, buy on credit, consume needlessly, anywhere in the world, not just the USA.

One may not be holding the actual gun or loading a plane with bombs, but unless you're on a general strike, refusing to pay taxes, generating and/or producing your own food, clothing, toys, gasoline, heat and air-conditioning ... you're involved ... "supporting" the manipulators of megacapital who can only survive on greed and war.

It may be more cowardly to cling to personal comfort than to a gun and an oath of honor.

Anonymous said...

Kate, I consider you to be a brilliant woman with extraordinary writing and reasoning skills, and with perspectives that are typically sane and balanced, but in this case I don't feel that you are being reasonable, balanced, or objective.

I certainly understand why, but still cannot agree with you. While you make an excellent point about armchair critics (of which I'm obviously one), you're simply too close to this subject, literally and figuratively, to be objective about it. Your son (sons?) is in the military, and in Iraq right now. Right? I therefore couldn't expect anything from you other than to support him, to want him home safe and sound. But, I'm sorry to have to say that I feel you're wrong on this one.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought that "I was only obeying/following orders" was not and is not a legit defense. Neither is it a moral defense.

Nobody can in good conscience attempt to defend the indefensible, and this war is indefensible.

Nevertheless, I still send thoughts of peace and safety to you and yours.

Blessings,
annemarie j

Kate-A said...

Hi Annemarie,
Thanks for the thoughts. My sons are safe stateside for the moment. I've never held that "obeying orders" is justifiable. It's not, the military has rules regarding same. That "just obeying" phrase somehow slipped into the conversation with Ian.

I feel we're on a very slippery slope here with accusing our troops of "only obeying orders" an indictment placing them in league with the Nazis and I wonder who is behind such a campaign and why, cui bono? I believe the bulk of our troops are serving the best they can, morally and honorably, in an awful situation. There are horrors, as in all wars.

I think the situation more complex than whether one supports this war, the troops, or not. Obviously from my writings I don't support war, nor do I defend those in uniform who practice "nazism." It's not war I find indefensible per se; I prefer targeting the system that can only function with war.

Ideally it would be nice if a million troops turned against misguided authority, but very unlikely. And I believe it beyond naive to expect the troops to drop their guns, lose their livelihoods, careers, homes, possibly family, at risk of prison - when Joe Antiwar isn't willing to face the same governmental power and risk punishment. I suspect if the people acted en masse, the troops would follow.

I expect armchair critics and anti-war followers to give no less than MLK : "It is not enough to say we must not wage war. It is necessary to love peace and sacrifice for it."

Anonymous said...

Kate said: Ideally it would be nice if a million troops turned against misguided authority, but very unlikely. And I believe it beyond naive to expect the troops to drop their guns, lose their livelihoods, careers, homes, possibly family, at risk of prison - when Joe Antiwar isn't willing to face the same governmental power and risk punishment. I suspect if the people acted en masse, the troops would follow.

I expect armchair critics and anti-war followers to give no less than MLK : "It is not enough to say we must not wage war. It is necessary to love peace and sacrifice for it."


When Joe antiwar isn't willing to do the same, take the same/similar risks...I agree wholeheartedly with this.

Also agree that the entire bloody system (esp. the military-industrial complex)is utterly corrupted, and is what needs to be disassembled.

Thank you for taking time to write and to explain further, now I fully understand your postion.

Bless you and yours Kate, stay well, amj

Anonymous said...

Paying taxes is less direct. Assuming you accot the principle of taxation for street lighting, public health care (OK bad example in US), welfare, etc. then in paying taxes you are supporting the state and in a sense trusting it to serve others. Are you going to withold just the percentage thats spent on the military, or all your taxes once you think the state has unclean hands in one area? Taxation is banditry and we are legally compelled to pay. The murderous marines are not legally compelled to fight illegal walls. Quite the reverse. Signing up given recent US history (Vietnam, Grenada,...) is a despicable act. Bombing foreigners for college fees, wasting arab kids' parents to feed your own sucks such big time I don't see how you can be other than ashamed of your childrens' choices.

Anonymous said...

I think you have a hammer on the nail.
It's always hard to walk the talk, without a leader.
And humans are sheep, scared ones at that, constantly looking for reassurance and succor.

Respect,

Nij Holm

Kate-A said...

Hi Nij,
People do seem to be followers. But any leader who could unite and lead the people would be quickly assassinated or "accidented."

It's mandatory there be a large body of regular folks speaking up, many mini "leaders" who do not seek to be lynchpins or icons, and for the people to learn to lead themselves without a figurehead who can be targeted. That way, the loss of one doesn't kill the dream.

Peace to all.

Anonymous said...

I wish you guys were more French.
More Kiwi even.
You people need to stop thinking and start cleaning house.
The dream is gone.
And I along with a few billion will never believe a leader is not possible.
The sheep need it and it cometh to sheep

Nij

Content © 2005-2020 by Kate/A.