Wednesday, October 19, 2005

Long Before

"Insider accounts published in the British, French and Indian media have revealed that US officials threatened war against Afghanistan during the summer of 2001. These reports include the prediction, made in July, that “if the military action went ahead, it would take place before the snows started falling in Afghanistan, by the middle of October at the latest.” The Bush administration began its bombing strikes on the hapless, poverty-stricken country October 7, and ground attacks by US Special Forces began October 19."

Just needed a Pearl Harbor type event PNAC says.

The chant "war planned long before" has been around a while, nearly always in reference to Iraq. We were lied to, tricked, deceived, by Bush and his evil band of Neocons for greed, power, profit, corporate fascism, imperialism, oil, liberation, freedom, hubris, hegemony, empire, because we are good people and want to spread democracy, because "they" attacked "us" – check all that apply, continue on.

Apparently most people believe the war on Afghanistan's Taliban was justified in a Bush photo-op manhunt moment of smokin' out bin Laden, dead or alive. But the strike on Afghanistan was no more legitimate than the war in Iraq.

However, to look closely at Afghanistan might be to look at 9/11. And looking too closely at 9/11 might remind us of those boxcutter totin' fireproof passport packin' extremists who dropped more clues than a trail of Hansel and Gretel-Atta breadcrumbs.

Might remind us that bin Laden immediately denied the attack but then released mini episodes of "Death to America Allah Allah" starring fat and skinny versions of himself. OBL transmitted guilt from his palatial cavern on the steppe then began to quickly disappear down the memory hole to Osama bin forgotten, after a brief stint as material for standup comics. Now his fan club fundamentalists release bulletins when the mostly Anglo need reminding that it's a different world, a world of fear and tell - if it looks suspicious, you know a soda can, t-shirt, brown skinned musicians on a plane, high school art projects, etc.

Many of the widest read "liberal progressive" news sites have no category or column for Afghanistan and those that do post a couple of stories and find the area a little used forum. Talking heads label it the "forgotten war" when they remember to report something on it.

The 911 truthseekers can count on a little anniversary exposure, some Cspan discussion, then fade - becoming JFKish, heard from in even numbered leaps, the 10th anniversary, the 15th, the 20th, etc. Marginalized to a few devoted investigators writing books and theories in the coming decades.

It's as if the public has been hurricaned. Inundated with so many countries, players, plots, lies and theories that we're on rooftops holding help signs as the foul water of a "different world" rises around us. It's not really different in the elite rule of doing business, but the stench reached a new level of awareness.

Yessiree, Iraq is the lie of the century we're told, and this past week or so birthed a new acronym, WHIG, but not everyone has caught yellowcake fever. While others demand to know who forged the Niger documents and await the severing of a few neocon heads (which changes nothing on the platter), some folks want the heads of who really planned those 9/11 planes long before.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hi Kate,
Thanks for writing this. Your perspective, analysis, and writing are spot on, as usual.

As for the central thrust of your piece, yes Afghanistan has been intentionally relegated to the far back burners. Seems strange until you take a long, hard look at the entire picture, the big con, the one that "officially" began on 9/11.

Peace to you and yours.

Sincerely, annemarie j

Anonymous said...

One reason Afghanistan is 'forgotten' by the MSM would probably be that the media is largely controlled, and the fact that Afghanistan is the world's largest producer of opium, the raw material for heroin., [http://www.tni.org/drugsconflict-docs/afghanistan.htm], not to mention increased conflict and American deaths there, would not reflect well on the current administration.

I don't know why the left blogosphere hasn't given Afghanistan more attention unless it's that it's more difficult to see what can be done about it whereas other more doable issues have taken precedence, achieving lives of their own, to where it seems the Left has established 'talking points', too.
dus7

Kate-A said...

Poppy is a very big reason no one is focusing on Afghan - $$$, and pipelines $$$.

I believe the American "left" leadership isn't any more honest than the right. Different "talking points" but basically the same results over the past many decades.

At least since WWII America has no "left" but a carefully crafted appearance of one. Something "doable" is a left talking point - sounds reasoned, sounds legitimate, sounds grown-up and assuages the fear and helplessness of Joe Progressive, but changes naught the status quo. The "left" can feel morally superior on what it "stands for" without risk, a political soap opera.

Anonymous said...

I don't know whether you want to discuss this, but while I think you are probably right about the major political parties being largely smoke and mirrors, one can see some progress (not recently but..) over our lifetimes* with civil rights, workplace safety and minimum wage, environmental controls, and so on. [*I'm about your age or a bit more.] Maybe I'm assuming the Left was responsible for most of it, and perhaps that's a wrong assumption.

If we really wanted to spread democracy, we would have modeled it here at home; ditto for universal education and health care, gender and ethnic equality, basic human rights, etc. The world knows what we're doing without our PR and propaganda, and they see the hypocrisy.

What I want to know is, aside from the fun of recreational political observation and critique (it's my spectator sport), what can we do? I'd like to see policies that work toward good and equitable things for absolutely everyone on earth. Dishonesty is now endemic in our culture, but there remain many honest and good-hearted individuals whose voices do not carry outside the local area. I suspect the 'think globally, act locally' motto is the one we want and that real change will (only) happen in a grass roots fashion.

I guess I need to start my own blog which I've been putting off for too long. Then I can more fully express myself without gumming up someone else's space. :)

Kate, your unique views remain valuable and important, and I appreciate them.
dus7

Kate-A said...

dus7,
I understand why you believe there's been progress in those areas but I feel the progress has been minute, bandaids on a gaping wound, intentionally thwarted by the status quo.

Yes, civil rights made advancements, which were also countered with MSM hype of the welfare queen, thugs, gangsters, etc. The words welfare, gangs, violence, drugs for most Americans evoke a Black image, thanks to MSM. I witness racism almost daily in the Heartland, more subtle than years past, but still racism.

I'd also have to disagree that the workplace is safer than it was in the 1960s or 70s. Personally I've worked as interpreter in an ER for migrant workers who come in with horrendous injuries who are stitched, sewn, and rushed to the state line by the boss. The local native workers are no safer in the same workplaces. I saw the best manufacturing environment in the 60s, with benefits, pay, retirement, much of that gone now.

Education, health care, have worsened in my view. The majority of medicine practiced today is no more than drugging the population with designer drugs for designer "disorders." Education is indoctrination.

I've seen our air dirtier, food more questionable, forests leveled, drinking water less safe in my lifetime. Asthma and respiratory ailments at a record high. Childhood cancers higher.

No one can live on minimum wage. To keep up with the cost of living minimum wage would need to be $11/hr and that was before the energy prices went up.

I don't think the problem is endemic to the US but is a worldwide system of "royalty" versus "serfs." We just don't call it that anymore. There are good people in the world but they can quickly be less so when goodness interferes with personal profit. I've literally had a family smile and give me their last bowl of soup in a war-torn third world country, not knowing when they would eat again. That's goodness. Giving when one has plenty takes nothing (and usually tax deductible).

Do start blogging as the more voices heard the more solutions the masses can formulate. But you're certainly not gumming up anything here. Acting locally is very important. I believe in the ripple effect. Good karma never hurts. ;)

ziz said...

Acting locally is very important. I believe in the ripple effect. Good karma never hurts

Hear Hear.

Don't be a spectator, it's great fun to take part .... at least you can rest knowing you did your best.

Content © 2005-2020 by Kate/A.