AmeriZion

Ninety years ago (1916) Louis Dembitz Brandeis was appointed the first Jewish justice on the Supreme Court. According to Benjamin Freedman (Jewish historian), Brandeis' appointment by President Woodrow Wilson was payment to Samuel Untermeyer regarding a personal matter that could have become embarrassing for Wilson. Untermeyer made Wilson an offer he couldn't refuse: appoint Brandeis and the situation will go away.

History touts Brandeis as the associate justice who fought for the little man, not how or why he was appointed the first Jew to SCOTUS. It's usually mentioned that Brandeis grew up a non-observant Jew. What's usually not mentioned is just before his court appointment he became a Zionist and was instrumental in establishing Zionism in the US.

Today progressives are quick to separate Jews from Zionists, just as they separate their favorite conservative pol from "neocons." It's a practice that will prove useful at the end of the slaughter as it can be claimed the atrocities were by the hand of fanatical "neocons."

The label "Zionists" serves the same purpose. A label cannot be hanged or punished per se, only blamed. Political movements such as the neocons and Zionists have come and gone throughout history. Only the name of the "movement" changes – the players and the agenda remain the same: domination by a few who believe they're entitled to rule the world.

In 1981 Alfred Lilienthal wrote: "When so much is at stake in the Middle East, inevitably the question must arise: How has the Zionist will been imposed on the American people? Far from all Jews believed in the concept of the Jewish state, and the Jews themselves constituted but a very small minority of the American population, less than three percent. Is it possible that Americans have been so apathetic that six million can manipulate 230 million?"

I no longer believe apathy is the culprit. More it is hard-heartedness born of a deliberate dumbing and numbing from the entertainment industry, educational system, the pharmaceutical industry, and a nanny/welfare state that largely helps those who deserve it least. Aided and abetted by the most corrupt and debased American politicians in history. And it's not a recent process.

As the Brandeis story illustrates, the total subversion of the republic's morals, allegiance, and democratic prospects began long ago, maybe as early as Ben Franklin's warning regarding the republic : "if you can keep it." Subversion brought about by religion and Machiavellianism under the guise of God and progress. Franklin more than likely knew a few such men.

Under disguise of being "multicultural" versus a melting pot, America has gone tribal, fighting for scraps from token representatives in D.C. And being tribal, most will support their own, right or wrong, right down to the blood-soaked end. Bush Boy was well aware of the nation's planned disunity (tribalism) and particularly the last two decades of intentionally building single issue tribes. His slogan of being a "uniter" had to get a few laughs in the backrooms.

Americans can pretend the country has recently been overtaken by a small band of Zionist Neocons who can be stopped. The better to sleep at night, thinking a small group of political fanatics are beatable. They will not point to the millions of Christians and Jews, with tribal racist attitudes, who supply funds and support the rhetoric which maintains an evil system of global murder, whether murder by bombing or business practices.

There must be a reason why Jews have been chased from lands for 2000 years. Unlike Christians they did not have the numbers or brawn to move in and slaughter the natives into converts; nor do they particularly desire converts as Jewish bloodlines are part and parcel of their chosen-ness. Lacking brawn Jews use brains to subvert a host culture. Since the turn of the last century, when the brains and the brawn set aside their prejudices and joined forces, whether willingly or through coercion, the duo seems bent on world conflagration. Whether believing one is entitled to rule the world and the other wants to bring back Jesus - the Jews and Christians are playing Russian roulette, but not pointing the gun at their own elite heads of course.

Many of both groups may claim "not in our name" but in the end will reconcile their cognitive dissonance with the prophecies and predictions of their Bibles - being good lambs and/or divinely commanded to slaughter man and beast. All this hell and fire is meant to be because the holy books tell them so. How many churches or synagogues in America have ever stopped a war or slaughter when the powers that be have their hearts set on it? Those who leave God out of the debate do it for greed. No one is driving moneychangers from the temple of America and there are no doves.

It was 25 years ago that Lilienthal stated : "Rarely has the deceit of so few been so widely practiced to the detriment of so many, as in the formulation and implementation of American Middle East policy."

I argue that it has always been the deceit of a few - but the implementation is carried out by the masses led by those few. And not only are the few so detrimental to the Middle East but to Latin America, much of Asia, and Africa. In the last three centuries everywhere the Jews-Christians have applied their formula they have left behind devastated land, inhumane poverty, and masses of dead. If at times a few of the "few" are outed, it is the foreign victim who is to blame - or at home, if necessary, blame is placed on some vague faction which "hijacked" national policy or parties.

This is not to say we blame the Jews or the Christians … but if the crusade fits … it must be theirs.