Ready to Go
Two years ago I would have said no way Hillary Clinton would be Commander in Chief but today it looks very possible. Perhaps John "Chameleon" Kerry will be the VP running mate as repayment for taking a dive in 2004's election. Many on the left, right, and center find the idea of Hillary as CIC a very unpleasant prospect but if you believe in stolen elections then who is to say the next globocorporate hydra head will not be the lady on the hill.
This week Germany has their first female chancellor, Angela Merkel. An ex-communist from the East but we know communists were only communist because they had to be back in those days. Similar to how Hillary used to be a liberal. Clinton is working hard, and succeeding, to change her image from a liberal feminist to a moderate democrat, strong on national security. Both women supported the Bush invasion of Iraq, or in newspeak – the liberation of Iraq. Merkel credits Hillary as inspiration for her own softer hair-do and welcomed Clinton on her Living History book tour in Germany (where it was a bestseller). Doubtful we'll hear Rodham-Clinton natter about a global village ever again. Talk will be of global peacekeeping troops – it now takes a boot - of well-armed global khaki to raze a child. President Hillary will cobble an international army ASAP with assistance from Europe.
Ms. Clinton woos the rightwing fundies and Jewish votes with periodic pilgrimages. She recently slipped a note between the stones of Jerusalem's Western Wall - many Jews believe that pleas placed between the stones of the holy site are answered by God (Hillary's note said "Me 2008"). At the other wall, (the apartheid wall that Humpty Sharon built) Clinton stated "This wall is not against the Palestinian people. This is against terrorists. The Palestinian people have to help prevent terror. They have to change their attitudes about terrorism." Her solution (the same as Bush solution) – Palestinians need a change of attitude.
Last week she urged Bush to challenge China's "forced abortion" policy, calling the Chinese policy of one child per family a "fundamental injustice." She condemned China's "use of psychological and economic pressure and threats to force women to terminate pregnancies." One billion+ Chinese need US family planning challenges from Hillary who personally produced one child. (Chelsea will be a credit to her though.)
She is not against free trade and outsourcing as we know it. Last year, defending India's software giant TCS, she said "We are not against all outsourcing; we are not in favor of putting up fences." (Humpty's wall against terror is not a fence.) Clinton assured heads in India this past May regarding any anti-India sentiment in America that … "there are people who feel left behind and might stir up negative feelings against India because they do not understand the economic benefits of outsourcing," In Hillaryspeak – people have a bad left-behind attitude because they misunderstand corporate economics.
Last month she slammed S. Korea's "historical amnesia" or their seeming ingratitude for the peace and prosperity given them by US benefactors; the right gets pumped up hearing that sort of come-uppance to ingrate nations. But then she backpedaled stating she only meant both countries need to ensure their relationship remains strong (as if there's any chance of Korea reuniting or us giving a spit if they did).
Putting aside her weenie faux suggestions to tweak the P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act she supports the Act as necessary in the War on Terror. Offhand I can't think of anything she has accomplished in the area of civil rights, women and children, privacy, poverty, equality in the legal system, etc. But I may have been out of the country when she did so perhaps others can enlighten me of her triumphs for the people.
Ms. Hillary is quoted as wanting tighter border security and a solution to illegal immigration, but voted no on more border patrol. Last July when speaking to the National Council of La Raza she said she wanted to make sure Hispanic children get a fair education, that families have medical insurance, (can the rest of us have some of that too?) and spoke of supporting legislation to make it easier for immigrants to send money home to Mexico. (Still keeping it easy for most of us to send money home to IRS.)
Hillary stops just short of supporting reparations for Black America but says "We owe an apology to African-Americans for hundreds of years of slavery." Haven't heard the slavery apology but the old boys in the United States Senate apologized June 2005 to the victims of lynching and for not passing anti-lynching legislation sooner. Fortunately for Ms. Clinton the Bush regime's abysmal response to Katrina, and exclusion in the aftermath, will drive many wavering Black conservatives to the Democratic party. Bush apologized for that one already but as with any lynching – it was too little, too late.
She attends church; she supports faith based initiatives. She has "always been a praying person." And claims the debate over faith initiatives and separation of church and state has been a "false division." Amen Sister Hillary saith the Christian wing.
She proposes liberating oppressed women around the world with access to credit (through IMF and World Bank traps), uplifting starving mamas and their children (continuing war on poverty), yet has proven a woman's place is to stand by her philandering man and give him all the love she can, because she knows the road to the White Hou… er … I mean … knows marriage is sacred.
Scandal seems to have taken a holiday from the Clintons. Looks as if all the Arkansas and Potomac ponds have been dredged and the "gates" closed. The coming image of H. Clinton will be packaged as a new era in American politics which so many rightly believe is so needed. A female president, a living history event. Intelligent, experienced, no longer a bleeding heart but a moderate hawk. A matron saint who could unite the US dysfunctional family. Typical red state voters will reason "well, she cain't do no worse than a man."
Coming soon, to a blitz near us, more important than the issues and advisors, will be the Clinton shade of lip gloss and her choice of suit color, walking across tarmacs in black boots, exquisite coat flared in the wind, tailored square shoulders. By the end of the PR campaign, folks will be real keen on the idea an iron-fisted Commander in silk and cashmere; fascism all gussied-up.
12 comments:
But she better check her eyeliner, but I'm sure she has plenty on the payroll to take care of that!
Great post. I think of the domestic feel the G8UNSA will receive from having a mother in office. We will get great views into the workings of the white house while she updates the décor. Of course I assume we will see a Christmas greeting from the kitchen of the WH with her cooking a bird with all the fixings. There will be an expose on the WH walk-ins showing her collection of fine Italian shoes and seemingly endless supply of pant suits.
But one thing I do see for as well, is her eminent assassination. It will be viewed as a slap in the face of progressiveness. Of course the culprit will be a person of a nation that oppresses their women and see her power as against gods will. In that, we will see a huge flux of women supporting the wars against these nations, in hopes that they can release these women from bondage.
We will also see a lot of men come over the fence as this is no way to treat a lady. Using this natural instinct to protect, we will see peoples reason to support change from protecting the home land to protecting the home. In the words of Martha Stewart, Domestication of ones nation, it’s a good thing.
Yikes, assassination hadn't crossed my mind but you may be right.
I see her using a hammer on us, she'll just place our heads on a pillow to cushion the blow.
I can just picture a Hillary (demoncrat)versus Condi (repug) bake-off. LOL
Just imagine. 2 anti-christers slugging it out NWO style. Those 2 hell raisers could take cat-fighting to the next level of well, hell!
White repug voters, in particular, would be so confused and outraged, they'd be forced to choose between whom they hate the least: "liberals" or "kneegroes". I say all those god-fearin' types hate the latter more.
And nobody will have to rig elections in Florida (as but one example), as so many confused and outraged blacks, in particular, would'nt know which bitch to choose ... UNLESS ... Hill selects Barack Obama as her running mate; and then the fix will be in. And all the shoes will go to not "Imelda" Rice, but "Chameleon" Clinton.
Then there's no way that Hill would be assassinated, UNLESS the broader game plan is to launch a race war in Amerakkka! Wouldn't be the first time would it, grrrrrrrrrrr.
In such a scenario, who then would be Condi's running mate? Some wildly popular 'grass-roots' Repug General? Someone re-packaged, re-purposed a la Murtha? Naturally, he must be white. This could be Jesus' second incarnation, still there's no way white America's (yet, ever?)gonna' select a black president.
There are numerous other scenarios that I haven't thought of. But, whatever unfolds, nothing but nothing will surprise me.
The entire system is rigged and corrupted beyond repair. Must be torn apart, start from scratch.
Can't be said often enuff, imo. Strike at THE root. Hint: the love of money (materialism) is the root of all evil ;) ;)
Hit the neo-scum (repugs and demoncrats, et al...) where it actually hurts, and can actually have positive effects, short- and long-term.
Just my fiddy cents worth.
Thanks again Kate. You're one helluva writer and then some.
amj
Thanks for an overview of the former First Lady's political repositioning. I have no doubt she will be the democratic candidate for 08, perhaps Kerry as VP but more likely Edwards, because he's easier to boss around and would be most grateful for a return to the Beltway. Hillary will try to wrap up all the loose ends of policies enacted since Reagan. I hope we can stop her.
Rice's only chance to land in the WH is as a VP candidate because without a husb... she is unacceptable; Diebold can't help.
I think Chelsea is being groomed for the presidency in what, at this rate, will become an appointment.
Condi for POTUS. She has CONNECTIONS ... and a fine pair of pins.
http://www.commondreams.org/views05/1123-28.htm
"You're not listening Hillary."
Good commentary piece I thought that y'all might enjoy, if you already haven't.
Also, perhaps more importantly, I'd like to *retract* my use of the word kneegroes, in my above post. I should have said blacks or black people. But with Condi in mind, as well as having recently read that word used by Kate (in a clear, unambiguous way), I was too quick to employ it. But I can't change it now since there's no edit feature. doh!
Reason is, my use of that word was sticking in my craw last night, nagging at me. It just didn't feel right to have used it as I did. I felt that my use of it wasn't clear, and might even be regarded as bigoted or confusing. I'm sorry if I gave that impression. I'm not a bigot and I don't like to confuse.
Anyway, I trust that this is now cleared up. And,thanks for listening. Peace everybody, amj
amj
don't let the word stick in your craw. I didn't read it as anything offensive or bigoted.
I don't see Condi running but anything is possible these days. I don't see the republicans nominating her for anything other than what she has been, their "kneegro." But by 2008 the elite may need so much distraction that they do run her simply for the sideshow of 2 females.
Cat fight, cat fight. ;)
Clinton will run in 2008 with Jeb Bush as her running mate.
"Clinton will run in 2008 with Jeb Bush as her running mate." by anon
Is Jebbo a Demo? I thought he was a repug, non?
In this scenario, Hill could win, she'd be assassinated, blame it on the Taliban, al Qaeda, or some newfangled el-al something or other ;) ;)
et voila, Jeb steps in like Johnson did after JFK's murder, to continue the Bush dynastic rule. Yeah, another pukin' possibility.
No matter the scenario, I can't see anything improving soon, not till the entire rotten system is dismantled.
Methinks it's gonna get a whole lot more ugly before the dawn. :(
amj
me again, Clinton will become a Republican, bank on it.
"Clinton will become a Republican"
It's always been a one party system, the public is just becoming more aware of it. A self-serving government mob. They just take turns being the "bad" party so we think we have a choice.
During WWII some screamed about the same issues, loss of liberties, censorship, atrocity, dropping 2 bombs on Japan, etc. Most folks in the US just went on about their business and tried to survive the times.
Only difference is today the masters aren't sharing in the windfalls. There will be no 1950s suburban boom with happy housewives and vets building homes and going to school on GI benefits. No major manufacturing offering top wages and benefits. No massive capital reinvested in America from war time profits.
Around the heartland folks feel it even if they're not able to put it into words. Hence the investment into Homeland security - to protect the government, the system, and not from Al-queda or Mohammed.
Post a Comment